UC Berkeley students put new startups to the test at SCET Collider Cup


As Fall semester came to a close, student teams from entrepreneurship classes offered through the Sutardja Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology competed in the first annual Collider Cup.

The event required participants to present their end-of-the year projects to real movers and shakers in the startup space, resulting in one stand-out team taking the prize home. The Sutardja Center held the event to not only challenge students to pitch the ideas they created in their classes, but also to give them the opportunity to form connections with successful entrepreneurs.

The winner was Team Healthchain, a student group from the Data-X course taught by Iklaq

Sidhu. Team Healthchain created a way to store medical files in cases of emergencies on the Interplanetary File System network (IPFS). This new internet protocol allows users to permanently store their medical information on a decentralized network that can be accessed on any internet browser. To access their files, users use their fingerprint as a biological key to authenticate their identity and medical history. From there, they have access to all of their important documents on-hand in the unfortunate case of an emergency.

Following Team Healthchain in second place was Adipocapsules, a team that proposed a prototype for creating plant fats and emulsions with natural ingredients. Third place was a three-way tie between Solea, which showcased its sustainable fish oil; Marble Solutions, which improved fat solubility for plant-based foods; and PeerInvest, which created an app that allows users to hand-pick individual investors for their stock portfolio.

Though this event was a competition, it also served as an huge learning and networking opportunity for the Sutardja Center’s students. Judges were an eclectic group of Silicon Valley influencers — ranging from entrepreneurs to SCET alumni to prominent venture capitalists. Due to the high caliber of judges and the work put in throughout the semester, teachers and panelists alike had high expectations for the students’ pitches.

In many ways, the Collider Cup served as the ultimate final for SCET students. Instead of having to go to an exam room and put pen to paper, students crafted professional-level pitches and opened their ideas up for criticism.

UC Berkeley senior Shelby Gualter — a PeerInvest team member and former student of the Product Management Collider Course — found the competition, and SCET courses at large, to be beneficial for UC Berkeley students who wish to enter the growing world of tech.

“Since we’re so close to Silicon Valley, students at Cal are seeing all these new emerging trends and SCET’s Collider Courses give us the opportunity to investigate these growing fields and to think about where we can make change in them,” Gualter said.

The post UC Berkeley students put new startups to the test at SCET Collider Cup appeared first on UC Berkeley Sutardja Center.



Source link

Finding Greener Ways to Improve Technology


For the first time ever, Berkeley-Haas Entrepreneurship  (BHEP) and Berkeley’s IEOR  department have joined forces to form an immersive and rigorous course, Lean Transfer (INDENG 290). This course consists of MBA students as well as M.Eng. students, undergraduates and visiting scholars. On November 29th, students in Lean Transfer presented their final pitches to fellow classmates as well as the inventors whose technologies were at the core of the class.

 

About Lean Transfer

Typical Lean Launchpad classes require students to supply their own ideas and technologies. However, not all students are inventors and many want to learn Lean principles without the pressure of starting an actual company.  Lean Transfer solves this problem by giving students access to world-class technologies created by UC Berkeley’s Bakar Fellows as a basis for learning the Lean Startup process.

Students spent the first few weeks of the course learning about these technologies from several generous Bakar Fellows and their grad students.  Students then formed teams around projects as diverse as making “greener jeans” to widely applying a novel microscopy technique.  The students also learned how to create testable hypotheses on finding a product-market fit.  These hypotheses were tested with potential customers using Lean Launchpad tools as well as “relentlessly direct” feedback from weekly presentations.  Each team completed 85+ interviews and had multiple pivots as they moved closer to the “ground truth” about their technology’s commercial potential.

 

Team Greener Jeans

 

Final Pitches

Student teams shared their Lessons Learned with the instructors, inventors and representatives from UC Berkeley’s Intellectual Property and Industry Research Alliances (IPIRA) group.

Although all teams experienced multiple pivots, none of the teams found a product-market fit to justify a standalone venture. However, the teams identified licensing and partnering as promising next steps for their technologies to be incorporated into larger products and services.

In summary one student, Rachel Grossberg, stated, “Having the best technology in the world doesn’t make it any easier to create a sustainable business.”  

 

 

Special thanks to UC Berkeley IPIRA, the Bakar Fellows inventors, and the graduate students who provided their knowledge and experience to help guide the students in Lean Transfer this past semester. More thanks to the volunteer co-instructors Errol Arkilic (M34 Capital), Darren Cooke (Torvents, Life Science Angels), Rhonda Shrader (Executive Director of BHEP) and GSI Chinmay Malaviya for making this course a reality!

The post Finding Greener Ways to Improve Technology appeared first on UC Berkeley Sutardja Center.



Source link

The Key to a Good M&A Outcome for Your Start-up? Getting Started Yesterday!


Designing Good Exits: It’s Not Just for Architects

None of us would feel comfortable in a building where no thought had been given to how to exit the structure.  A rushed and panicked egress would be dangerous, and no building has its first brick laid without viable exit paths being designed into its architecture.

The same is true with start-up companies. But, more often than not, founders don’t give thought to architecting exit paths for their start-ups until it’s too late. Entrepreneurs are a sanguine lot, and nurse heady visions of exit via IPO for their companies. However, as recent numbers show, over 91% of all exits are through mergers and acquisitions (M&A), not IPO:  according to the National Venture Capital Association’s 2017 Yearbook, the period 2012-2016 saw 4,084 M&A transactions against 387 IPOs.

With these probabilities in mind, start-up entrepreneurs are well-served by planning for their most likely exit path, the M&A, and doing so just as architects do:  from the very beginning of their start-up project. Today — and every day that follows — is the right time to lay the groundwork for a good M&A exit.  Being M&A-ready is not an afterthought that should be left to Day N of your company’s life.

Of course, the ideal path to an exit, including to an IPO, is via regular and substantive revenue growth, with the start-up’s steady approach to profitability.  If your company falls into this happy category then you’ll have a long line of corporate suitors (and maybe even IPO underwriters) wending its way to your door.  But whether your company is a wild success or whether your start-up life is characterized by hand-to-hand combat for customers and hand-to-mouth finances, you need to start today in planning and preparing for your statistically-likely exit.  Here are five guideposts to help you on that path.

 

Build a Business Case for Your “Customer”

In an M&A, your “customer” is the acquirer.  So just as you take pains to understand why your actual end-customers will pay you good money for your product, you should also take pains — on Day 1 of your company’s life — to understand your universe of potential acquirer “customers”, and why each would pay good money to one day acquire your company.  Understand at a deep level the essence of the business of each potential acquirer and how you would add value (specifically, revenues) to it.

No acquirer — not public companies nor private ones — want negative effects on their bottom line from an acquisition. Everyone needs a plausible reason as to why an acquisition will be earnings-per-share (EPS) accretive, if not today then at some point in the not-too-distant future.  As a consequence, the foremost thing you need is a believable business case that illustrates the customer and revenue impact you can bring to the acquirer.  With the business case as your driver, partner early and partner closely with each potential acquirer. (Co-selling is the best form of partnership!)  Keep in mind that end-customer sales cycles are always longer than you expect, and corporate partnerships (both at the organizational level and the ever-crucial personal level) take a long time to build.

It’s a truism that companies are bought, not sold. The best guidance for how to engineer your start-up to be bought is to always see it as an acquirer (and their investment banker) would: discover the holes and liabilities and fix them; discover the strengths and (revenue) opportunities and build on them.

 

Identify Multiple Acquirers

Imagine turning up at an art auction and finding that you’re the only bidder there.  Who’ll then set the price for whatever masterpiece is on offer?  You will, of course.  It’s for this reason that start-ups need to build partnerships as early as possible with multiple potential acquirers.  One is not enough, no matter how deep the relationship.  Identify potential acquirers who are in complementary spaces so that your partnerships aren’t derailed by competitive concerns.  Build a business case for each acquirer.  Then partner aggressively with all of them.  Remember, if there’s only one bidder for your M&A deal then you’re not going to be the one setting the acquisition price.

 

Exercise Corporate Hygiene — Always

Start-up life is characterized by an unending series of exigencies, each more critical than the last.  It’s easy under these circumstances to lose sight of the dreary, quotidian bureaucracy also associated with running a company.  Doing so, however, will likely be an M&A deal-killer.  Acquirers want transparency into your business and a comprehensive understanding of all of the risks, liabilities and obligations your start-up might bring.

Satisfying the need for transparency requires that you exercise corporate hygiene in the running of your company from the very first day.  This will allow you to build a bulletproof portfolio of diligence items that an acquirer will eventually demand.  At a minimum you should be prepared to provide:

  • Clear evidence of IP ownership: signed confidential and proprietary information agreements with employees and contractors, including with mundane entities such as off-shore QA companies. In the software sector, acquirers might also expect an assurance that you use no open source code in your technology base.
  • Patents: and who’s listed on these patents?
  • Organizational chart: employee name, job title, location, compensation. Any severance agreements or stock acceleration?
  • Signed board minutes for all board meetings
  • Unresolved litigation. Also, might there be litigation risk once the acquisition is announced?
  • Stock issues
  • D&O (directors and officers) insurance: always better to have this in hand. You may not be able to get a policy once a term sheet has been issued.
  • Quarterly and annual financial statements
  • Customer lists
  • Cap table
  • Copies of all agreements (must be transferrable to an acquirer): customers, partners, vendors, landlords
  • Employee records: any tax issues?
  • Employee benefit programs
  • Presentations used in diligence meetings

Corporate hygiene — i.e., religiously keeping on top of all of the items above — needs to be institutionalized into your operating practices from the day your company’s founded.  It’s well-nigh impossible to build in hygiene as an afterthought, let alone at the eleventh hour of an M&A diligence exercise.  Bear in mind that while this will be your company’s first acquisition, it may easily be your acquirer’s hundredth.  They’ll have a process!  You need to be able to smoothly feed that process as your acquirer demands.

The topic of “disclosures” will also arise: specifically, what dark secrets lurk in your company that must be divulged?  Lawsuits?  Delinquent employment taxes for that former sales rep in Monterey?  Unpaid invoices?  The best advice on disclosures is to disclose everything.  This is the only thing that’s going to release whatever transaction proceeds that will be held in escrow, and also prevent you from getting sued for fraud somewhere downstream.

Importantly, employ an outstanding attorney as company counsel from your very first day of business.  In an M&A, you never want your attorney to merely be the second smartest legal mind in the room.  It’s painful.

 

Get a Good Banker

Just as you want your attorney to be smarter and more experienced than your acquirer’s attorney, you also want your investment banker to be smarter and more experienced than your acquirer’s banker and internal M&A team.  Recruiting — and I mean “recruiting”, not “selecting” — a top-notch banker is key. The best bankers can do without your business, which is why you’ll need to sell them on your deal, as much as (indeed, more than) they try to sell you on their services.

There’s a large class of bankers who can make the sun shine in the Mojave and the tide come in twice a day, and will cite these as proof of their capabilities.  Needless to say, avoid these masters of the facile. The best bankers, whether they’re high-profile, bulge-bracket firms or world-class boutiques, add actual value in your transaction. They help build the synergy story for the acquirers, have credibility with potential acquirers, are able to bring multiple suitors to the altar, are familiar with what the “market” conditions are for deal terms (escrow periods, holdbacks, management carve-outs, …), and are able to maximize the results of the transaction.

Perform rigorous due diligence on all bankers under consideration: confirm that they’ve added value in multiple sell-side transactions in your space.  References with past clients are best.

 

Time is Not on Your Side

It’s probably fair to say that never in recorded history has an acquisition price gone up after an M&A term sheet has been issued.  If you’re lucky, the deal will close at the term sheet’s price.  But perhaps more likely, your deal will close at a lower price than on the term sheet.  Why? Because “issues” get exposed in the diligence process, issues that negatively affect the acquisition price.

Time, therefore, is your greatest enemy in an M&A process.  The longer your diligence runs the greater the chance that some issue or development will reduce your acquisition price, if not upend your transaction altogether.  These may be anything from macro-economic forces, to negative diligence results, to litigation, to management turn-over or missed quarterly earnings at the acquirer.  Which is why every start-up needs to have its sell-side diligence — business case and corporate hygiene items — in hand well in advance of any deal.  Delaying this “until we need it” only compromises speed and your ability to have the exit you so desire.

 

Start Yesterday.  You’ll Thank Yourself Tomorrow.

For start-ups, unfortunately, it remains a buyer’s market.  Power is firmly vested in the hands of larger acquiring companies.  This dynamic is unlikely to change — ever.  With that reality in mind, and given the sheer number of start-ups being founded every year, the vast majority of whom will find themselves clamoring to be acquired, entrepreneurs need to carefully craft their businesses to optimize their chances for a profitable exit via the path of acquisition.

Just as you wouldn’t wait till age 65 to start planning for your retirement income, nor should you wait till your “We have to exit!” moment to start planning for getting your start-up acquired.  Nothing is gained by ignoring the realities of life.  So start planning and preparing for an acquisition at the earliest possible moment, and keep these M&A dynamics in mind when making day-to-day operating decisions.  Do things right, and the only time you’ll see the words “No Exit” will be on street signs you pass as you drive to consummate your M&A mega-transaction.

 

The post The Key to a Good M&A Outcome for Your Start-up? Getting Started Yesterday! appeared first on UC Berkeley Sutardja Center.



Source link

Now hiring: tenure-track faculty position at the Jacobs Institute for Design Innovation


The Jacobs institute for Design Innovation is currently hiring for a tenure-track assistant professor position with a start date of July 2018. The position will work at the intersection of design and emerging technologies such as health and medical devices, smart and connected products, and bio-inspired design.

Sutardja Center Faculty director and professor Ikhlaq Sidhu is on the search committee and encourages members of our global academic network to apply.

View full job description

 

The post Now hiring: tenure-track faculty position at the Jacobs Institute for Design Innovation appeared first on UC Berkeley Sutardja Center.



Source link

State grant accelerates UC Berkeley’s innovation and entrepreneurship

The University of California, Berkeley has announced promising early results from a $2.2 million grant provided by the State of California. The grant has helped UC Berkeley, already a global hub for innovation, to expand its entrepreneurship activities with new facilities, courses and programs.

“The funding adds fuel to the already simmering passion and drive of the entrepreneurial spirit at Cal by funding programs and infrastructure,” says Carol Mimura, Assistant Vice Chancellor, IP & Industry Research Alliances. “Just as importantly, it has forged alliances by uniting people — in units across campus  — in a common cause to streamline entrepreneurship training, startup incubation and acceleration.”

The State of California provided the grant through Assembly Bill 2664, recognizing that the University of California has been instrumental in boosting the state economy by launching and growing some of California’s most successful industries, including aerospace, biotech, computers and digital media.  A recent analysis shows that 300 startups coming from Berkeley alone have raised a total of $4.7B bilion in funding.

In total, the State of California provided $22 million across the UC system, which has so far supported more than 500 new startups and existing companies, helped launch at least 47 new products and enabled companies to attract $3.7 million in additional investments.

At Berkeley, the grant has allowed the campus to engage 653 startup teams and 2,201 entrepreneurs. Supported entrepreneurship and innovation groups include the Berkeley-Haas Entrepreneurship Program, the Blum Center for Developing Economies, CITRIS Foundry, Jacobs Institute for Design Innovation, LAUNCH, the NSF I-Corps Bay Area Node, the Office of Intellectual Property & Industry Research Alliances, SkyDeck, Startup @ Berkeley Law, the Sutardja Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology and affiliated programs.

These Berkeley entrepreneurship hubs have not only been able to expand their reach through courses and programs, but the state support has also enabled the groups to coordinate their efforts and create a more visible pipeline for students working to commercialize their ideas.

One initiative that shows this clearly is BEGIN, the Berkeley Gateway to Innovation (coebadss.wpengine.com), a new web portal that helps entrepreneurs navigate the entrepreneurship ecosystem at Berkeley and identify appropriate entry points for their ideas and enterprises from among the suite of available programs.

“We are pleased to see tremendous progress on AB 2664, especially in the way that it has enabled Berkeley’s units that support different aspects of entrepreneurship to develop cohesive pipelines for new venture development,“ says Ikhlaq Sidhu, faculty director & founder at the Sutardja Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology.

Here are a few other highlights of new educational programming that has been enabled by the AB 2664 grant at Berkeley so far:

  • Berkeley hosted its first Inclusion in Entrepreneurship Summit, which brought together over 400 entrepreneurs from varied backgrounds to help attendees gain access to federal, state, and local resources. More than 25 federal agencies and 75 investors from the Bay Area participated in panel discussions and met with local entrepreneurs, resulting in more than 500 one-to-one meetings.
  • The CITRIS Foundry expanded its 500 sq. ft. of office space to a multi-use 3,500 sq. ft. facility to meet the demand for technology startup acceleration. The new CITRIS Foundry Entrepreneurship Hub will support up to 60 university entrepreneurs while they access specialized labs, training, mentorship, and world‐class research at UC Berkeley.
  • The Sutardja Center for Entrepreneurship and Technology hired a program manager, who was critical in launching new initiatives. Supported programs included the Management of Technology Innovation program, which facilitated collaborations with industry experts, the Transnational Security Collider, which connected undergraduate students and innovations to federal stakeholders, and the new Alternative Meat Lab, which is creating plant‐based meat alternatives.
  • Berkeley-Haas Entrepreneurship Program and the Sutardja Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology have created a new Lean Transfer course that aims to build technology startups with intellectual property from UC Berkeley.
  • Berkeley-Haas Entrepreneurship Program also expanded its Startup Disco to include a course for undergraduate students.  This hackathon-style class is offered by Haas to train students in starting new ventures.
  • SkyDeck has expanded its mentor program with over 100 SkyAdvisors, and enhanced acceleration programs to support their next cohort of startups, which will each receive $100,000 in funding from the newly launched Berkeley SkyDeck Fund.
  • In 2017 Berkeley Law’s New Business Practicum/Startup @Berkeley Law Program assisted 214 new Bay Area entrepreneurs who could not afford legal assistance, totaling 1,264 hours of free legal help, valued at approximately $474,000.

The UC system also leveraged AB 2664 to raise $11.1 million in matching funds from corporate and philanthropic sources, with more fundraising to come. As of November 2017, campuses had received over $5.5 million in matching funds, with another $5.6 million committed.

AB 2664, the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Expansion, was authored by Assemblymember Jacqui Irwin and signed in fall 2016 by Gov. Jerry Brown. Through the bill, each of UC’s 10 campuses received $2.2 million in one-time funding in January 2017 to invest in infrastructure, incubators and entrepreneurship education programs.

In 2013, UC President Janet Napolitano launched the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Initiative to leverage the scale and diversity of the UC system to build an even more vibrant entrepreneurial culture. For more information about innovation at UC, including the university’s new contest for alumni entrepreneurs, visit entrepreneurs.universityofcalifornia.edu.

To learn more about how the entire University of California has leveraged AB 2664 support, visit here.

 

New board members join Alt.meat lab


This week at the Alternative Meat Lab, students presented their latest plant-based meat projects and welcomed new board members who will be donating their expert advice to assist the lab with domain-specific knowledge in an industry that is just getting started.

The Alternative Meat Lab board members include:

    • Ryan Bethencourt, partner and co-founder of IndieBio, the world’s leading biotech accelerator. Ryan is also faculty at Singularity University and CEO & co-founder of three biotech companies.
    • Peter Cnudde, industry fellow and advisory board member for the Sutardja Center and former vice president of engineering at Yahoo. Peter was one of the people behind the creation of the plant based meat courses at the Sutardja center.
    • Julie Mann, global protein program manager at Ingredion Inc., a leader in developing ingredients such as sweeteners, starches, and biomaterials. Ingredion is also a leader in developing pulses, which are promising raw materials for the production of plant-based meats. Before joining Ingredion, Julie spent more than twenty years as an innovator and researcher at The Hershey Company.
    • Scott May, vice president of global innovation at Givaudan, an international leader in developing flavors and fragrances, including for leading plant-based meat companies. Scott currently heads up MISTA for Givaudan, a state-of-the-art product development facility located in San Francisco.
    • Jason Ryder, interim CTO of Hampton Creek, a leading plant-based foods company. Jason is a UC Berkeley chemical engineer (PhD, ‘03) and Vice President of Process Research & Development at Hampton Creek.
    • Ricardo San Martin, visiting professor at UC Berkeley from Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. Ricardo is the instructor for alternative meat courses and co-lead for the lab.

Advisors and board members watch student presentations. From left to right: Scott May, MISTA & Givaudan; Flavio Garofolo, Givaudan; Professor Ricardo San Martin; Allison Berke, Good Food Institute; Ryan Bethencourt, IndieBio; Rebecca Cross; Peter Cnudde, Yahoo

Next generation plant-based meat

Students also presented their final projects from the fall 2017 semester, which included innovative product ideas to solve some of the current issues with alternative meat texture, taste and moisture. Projects ranged from recognizable “meat” products such as deli slices, bacon, fish cakes, and beef jerky replacements, to the highly technical, such as engineering better plant-based fat.

One team with the project titled “Removal of off-flavors in legumes” focused on a big problem with using pea protein in plant-based meat products — its flavor. Pea protein has grown in popularity among plant-based enthusiasts as an alternative to soy, but its organic compounds give it a planty off-flavor that is undesirable. Cooking, steaming, and heating help remove these off-flavors, but this process is expensive and time-consuming. To address this issue, the team synthesized a peptide chain that selectively binds and removes n-Hexanal, which creates the undesirable flavors. The team believes this may be 50% more efficient than previous methods.

Students using props to explain how their synthesized peptide chain can remove off-flavors from legumes

Students also explored interesting new plants that may have characteristics needed for better plant-based meat. For example, to help address the lack of juiciness that is a problem with many plant-based meat products, one team selected konjac as the base to create a gel-matrix that would provide improved melts-in-your-mouth moisture and texture. Another team used lupin with the goal of creating a plant-based jerky with better moisture to tap into the $50B salty snack market. Other interesting foods explored by student teams included algae, aduzuki beans, mung beans, various mushrooms, beets, turmeric, and spirulina.

Many teams also worked to improve the options for fat in plant-based meat products, one of the goals for the lab. One big issue with alternative meat products currently, is that most do not contain fat that does well at retaining moisture, and currently fats do not melt when cooked like in your average hamburger.

One team sought to address the fat issue in bacon, a favorite for meat-lovers. The most popular veggie bacon on the market currently does not emulate pork bacon fat very well, with its signature crispy skin, moisture, and marbling abilities. To work on the issue, the team ran controlled experiments to create prototypes based on sixteen different factors. Ultimately, the team may develop the best prototype into a powder that may be sold to plant-based meat manufacturers.

Results from experiments to find the best plant-based fat recipes

Besides environmental and ethical concerns, the other main reason that consumers are increasingly adopting diets with less meat are due to concerns about health. One group is seeking to improve the nutritional value of an American staple: chicken nuggets. While soy nuggets are already quite popular, they are made of mostly soy, which the group believes they can improve upon by using pea protein.

 

 

The post New board members join Alt.meat lab appeared first on UC Berkeley Sutardja Center.



Source link

Cal alum Arjun Dev Arora shares what he thinks is the “x-factor” every entrepreneur should have


Students in the A. Richard Newton Lecture Series attended a fireside chat with 500 Startups partner and Cal alum, Arjun Dev Arora.  While Arora is an engineer by training, he developed a keen interest in the business of technology while at Berkeley,  which has gone on to inform much of his career. During his talk, Arora chronicled his journey to 500 startups, highlighting important lessons he learned along the way, such as what the “x-factor” every successful entrepreneur needs to have, as well as the best and worst things to do when pitching your startup to investors.


Arjun Dev Arora came to Cal as an EECS major eager to immerse himself in the computer science ecosystem. But, as is true for many undergraduates, Arjun left his four years at Cal having done much more than sit in front of a computer: He was a member of Berkeley Consulting, received the Certificate in Entrepreneurship & Technology from the Sutardja Center, and interned at Deloitte and the finance software company, Intuit.

After graduation Arora worked at Jefferies Broadview for a year before once again returning to the tech world as the head of business development and business strategy at Yahoo’s real estate division.

Arora then ventured out on his own and spearheaded a digital advertising startup called ReTargeter on less than $25,000 in capital.  Over the next five years, Retargeter made its way to the forefront of the digital advertising space and was eventually acquired by Sellpoints in 2015.

Following ReTargeter’s acquisition, Arora had some time on his hands and some money to spend, so he tried his hand at angel investing. During his early days angel investing, Arora learned two important lessons: First, angel investing is a high-risk endeavor.  Once you write the check, you should not expect to see that money back. Second, out of all of his investments, Arora appreciated those who would update him and keep him in the loop the most. He recommended to any students in the audience who are planning on seeking investors for their companies to keep this sign of respect in mind.

Now Arora is a partner at 500 Startups where he leads their fundraising and investor relations team, as well as assists and invests in the company’s portfolio companies. Over the years, Arora has encountered a variety of different startups and heard many different types of pitches to investors. For Arora, the best pitches are those that are the most genuine and authentic to what the company stands for and the worst is when the pitches are obviously half-baked and underprepared. Being able to distill your message into a concise and professional speech can make a huge difference in how investors react to your product, according to Arora.

As his talk came to an end, Arora emphasized the “x-factor” that sets the successful entrepreneurs apart from the unsuccessful ones is that they know who their customers are and what they want. Likewise, they also have a good pulse on the future of the industry they’re in and can predict the changes to come.

“All of those pieces are critical,” Arora said. “You can’t just have one or two of them; you have to have all of them.”

 

The post Cal alum Arjun Dev Arora shares what he thinks is the “x-factor” every entrepreneur should have appeared first on UC Berkeley Sutardja Center.



Source link

Tech icon Judy Estrin spoke to Berkeley students on the importance of company culture and the evolution of Silicon Valley


Students in the A. Richard Newton Lecture Series attended a fireside chat with the iconic Judy Estrin. Known for contribution to the development of Transmission Control Protocol — a system that is critical for the networking in the internet to happen — Estrin has founded multiple companies, served on the board of directors for the likes of KQED and Disney, and held the position of Chief Technology Officer for Cisco. During her talk, Estrin emphasized the importance of having strong leadership skills in order to inform company culture as well as commented on the evolution of Silicon Valley at large.


When most 16-year-olds were grappling with the basic concepts of geometry, Judy Estrin was already entering her freshman year at UCLA. After graduating from undergrad, Estrin would go on to earn a master’s degree in electrical engineering from Stanford. And after that, Estrin — who was then in her early 20s — would move on to become one of the key players the development of the internet.

Needless to say, Estrin is an early pioneer and champion of technology as we know it today. With decades of experience in entrepreneurship and innovation under her belt, Estrin spent much of her fireside chat during the A.Richard Newton Lecture Series discussing her leadership philosophy and the importance of cultivating an environment conducive to innovation.

When Estrin first entered the workforce, she had never thought of herself as a leader. Instead, she considered herself more “people-centered.” But as her career progressed and as she was given more responsibility as a manager and then as a founder, Estrin learned the value of not only being a leader, but also the importance of continually developing her leadership skills.

For example, while she was CTO of Cisco, Estrin was managing a company with thousands of employees as well as entering an established company culture that was foreign to her. Instead of tightening the reins, Estrin realized that she could not control every aspect of her workforce and instead needed to learn to how to influence people in a more indirect way.

The awareness Estrin carried in her leadership tactics has served her well in her career, especially with regards to the insights it’s offered in cultivating an environment conducive to innovation.

According to Estrin, creating a diverse and collaborative environment may be a daunting task, however, it’s critical to driving a truly productive work environment. In fact, Estrin has boiled down the key factors needed to achieve a truly innovative and successful company culture to almost a science. The key principles that drive innovation in an organization are curiosity, willingness to take risks, openness to collaboration and feedback, patience, and trust among employees. For Estrin, a company can’t pick one principle over another. All five need to be present for innovation to occur.

As the talk came to a close, Estrin commented on the culture of Silicon Valley now as opposed to it in the late 70s, when she first came onto the tech scene. What she said is still the same is the plethora of passionate, smart people motivated to create. A key difference: the Valley’s current focus on money as opposed to collaboration. Estrin emphasized that this “rat race to be the biggest and best” has become a detriment to the tech world.

“This focus on money comes at the cost of solving problems that need to be solved,” Estrin said. “Now it’s all about being the next unicorn or celebrity CEO. It’s a rat race of needing to be the biggest and best.”

 

The post Tech icon Judy Estrin spoke to Berkeley students on the importance of company culture and the evolution of Silicon Valley appeared first on UC Berkeley Sutardja Center.



Source link

Steve Chen appointed to co-lead Berkeley Blockchain Lab


Steve Chen, founder of EchoLink, a credentials-verification blockchain project, has been appointed industry co-lead of the new Berkeley Blockchain Lab, a platform for students to gain real-world experience working with blockchain technology at the University of California, Berkeley.

The Berkeley Blockchain Lab is an initiative of the Sutardja Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology, which has been experimenting with blockchain programming for several years. The SCET launched its first blockchain course, the Blockchain Technology Collider, in March 2016, enabling undergraduate and graduate students from across the Berkeley campus in areas such as engineering, finance, economics, and mathematics to come together to explore emerging opportunities in blockchain at the intersection of finance, security and cryptography.

With the success of the initial collider and momentum in the area, the SCET launched the Berkeley Blockchain Lab this fall 2017. The lab allows students to work on real-world blockchain projects, take courses on blockchain technology, and conduct research in the rapidly-evolving field. Courses offered in the lab will also provide Berkeley students with credit toward the five required to earn the Certificate in Entrepreneurship & Technology.

EchoLink recently became the lab’s first supporter and partner with its first-of-its-kind Bitcoin donation to the blockchain lab. EchoLink seeks to create its own utility token, the EchoLink token (EKO), to establish an international education reputation and skill-level marketplace.

Steve Chen recently held a workshop at the Sutardja Center to help students learn the basic of blockchain development on the Ethereum platform.

“UC Berkeley is an ideal first pilot educational institution because of its active student blockchain enthusiast community,” says Chen. “With Berkeley’s reputation for strong economics and computer science programs, combined with its culture of student activism forged in the 1960s, the school is well-positioned culturally to take advantage of the focus on decentralization and the elimination of ‘middlemen’ and central authorities that blockchain startups often promote.”

The student blockchain community is strong at Berkeley. In 2016, Tobias Disse, a student from The Hague in the Netherlands, came to Berkeley as an exchange student through the SCET’s Global Partners Program. Disse, along with Berkeley students and other exchange students in the program, created Blockchain at Berkeley, a student group, which among other activities, helped support UC Berkeley’s initial two-unit “DeCal” blockchain course. This fall, the student group also organized a large blockchain conference, and just recently organized a conversation with SEC regulators on campus.

The Blockchain at Berkeley student organization has 567 members in its Facebook group and also has Meetup and Slack channels that are extremely active. The student leaders of Blockchain at Berkeley come from diverse professional experiences including serving as analysts of investment banks and software engineers at local tech startups. Collin Chin, UC Berkeley ’19 a current electrical engineering and computer sciences junior, was able to secure an internship at leading blockchain startup Consensys as a software engineering intern the summer of 2017 after getting his first taste of developing use cases for blockchain as a developer at Blockchain at Berkeley in the Fall of 2016.

Collin now serves on the Executive Board at Blockchain at Berkeley and handles recruiting of members and execution of events. Max Fang, President at Blockchain at Berkeley, also involved with the DeCal course, also spent his previous summer as a Developer Advocate Intern at Lightning Labs in SF and is a double major in computer science and economics.

EchoLink is building a blockchain-based system that provides verified education, skill, and work experience information. Taking advantage of blockchain technology’s immutability and time-stamp functionality, EchoLink provides users with trusted information regarding a job candidate’s education, skill, and work experience. EchoLink provides savings to recruiters in time and financial resources. The EchoLink system can be also be used for additional industries, such as banking, finance, general notary service.

Chen came up with the idea behind EchoLink while serving as the founding engineering director at a NYSE mobile technology company, where he saw the opportunity to create efficiency and value by storing data around engineering graduates’ degrees on the blockchain. Chen hopes to have the first batch of credentials stored on the platform by Spring 2018. With students opting in and registrars providing verified information, the information will then be accessible to recruiting partners and will save recruiters looking to hire top talent both time and financial resources. To get involved as an educational institution seeking to pilot the EchoLink technology, please reach out to Steven Chen at steve@echolink.tech.

The SCET has helped create the foundation of Berkeley’s entrepreneurship ecosystem by launching institutions and programs such as SkyDeck, the Fung Institute for Engineering Leadership, the Engineering Leadership Professional Program, Global Venture Lab, and cultivating an extensive network of Silicon Valley and global partners. The Berkeley Blockchain Lab will sponsor projects for students and faculty though an open a call in January 2018.  To get involved in the Berkeley Blockchain Lab please contact Jocelyn Weber at jweberphipps@berkeley.edu

 

The post Steve Chen appointed to co-lead Berkeley Blockchain Lab appeared first on UC Berkeley Sutardja Center.





Source link

Is your passport from one of these countries?: Nationality-specific visas for working and living in the U.S.


At the Sutardja Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology, we welcome many international students to our programs. But what happens after graduation? Our thanks to SCET mentor Nadia Yakoob for contributing the article below to help students understand options for staying in the U.S. after graduation to build a startup, work, or study. Also, please read her other articles in the series to understand how Optional Practical Training (OPT) works, what the requirements for the H-1B Visa are, how to obtain an O-1 Visa, and more.


This article is the last in my series of articles describing the various visa options available to international students for living and working in the United States after they graduate. The visa options discussed below are for individuals from certain countries with which the United States has agreements – specifically Australia, Mexico, Canada, Singapore, and Chile. If you are a national of one of these countries and want to understand more about your prospects for remaining in the US after you finish your studies, continue reading!

 

E-3 Visa for Australians

The E-3 visa is exclusively for Australian citizens who will work in “specialty occupations” in the U.S. A “specialty occupation” is defined as a job that typically requires a bachelor’s (or higher) degree. The requirements for the E-3 visa are very similar to the H-1B visa for high-skilled workers. Specifically, in order to qualify, the Australian must show 1) a job offer from an employer in the U.S. 2) the position requires a bachelor’s degree; 3) the Australian has a university degree that fits with the position; and 4) the employer will pay the “prevailing wage” for the position. The “prevailing wage” is the higher of either the actual salary paid by the employer to individuals in the same position or the wage set by the Department of Labor for the occupation in the area of intended employment. (Check out www.flcdatacenter.com for such wage information).

Australian entrepreneurs who want to start their own company in the U.S. cannot obtain the E-3 visa because having an ownership interest in the company sponsoring the E-3 visa is not allowed.

Every year, 10,500 E-3 visas are made available. The annual limit has never been reached.  Unlike the H-1B visa, which also has an annual limit, there is no lottery for the E-3 visa and there are visas available year-round.

 E-3 status is granted in two-year increments and can be extended indefinitely. Spouses and children are allowed to accompany the E-3 worker as dependents and the spouse (not children) is entitled to work authorization.

 

TN Visa for Canadians and Mexicans

Under the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”), Canadian and Mexican citizens may come to the U.S. to work in certain professions and are given TN status. The schedule of TN professions are available here.

An offer of employment by a U.S. employer is required and the Canadian or Mexican national generally must have a degree in the field of the profession. Unlike the H-1B and E-3 visas, the TN visa does not impose any salary requirements and there is no annual limit to the number of TN visas available each year.

The TN visa is not for entrepreneurs who want to start their own company and have their company sponsor their TN visa. Any significant ownership interest in the sponsoring company is not permitted.

TN status is given in three-year increments and can be extended indefinitely. Spouses and children are entitled to accompany the TN worker, but no work authorization is given to the dependents.

 

H-1B1 Visa for Chileans and Singaporeans

The H-1B1 visa is a subcategory of the H-1B visa, and is for citizens of Chile and Singapore. Of the 65,000 H-1B visas made available each year, 6,800 are reserved for nationals of Chile and Singapore. The annual limit of 6,800 visas is usually not an issue.

The substantive requirements are the same as for the H-1B visa: 1) job offer by an employer in the US; 2) the job must require a bachelor’s degree or higher; 3) the Chilean or Singaporean has a degree that fits with the position; and 4) the employer must pay the “prevailing wage” for the position.

As with most other employment-based visas, an ownership interest in the entity sponsoring the H-1B1 visa is not permitted.

H-1B1 status is granted in one-year increments and can be renewed indefinitely. Spouses and children are entitled to join the H-1B1 worker, but work authorization is not given.

 

The Upshot

If you are a national of Australia (E-3), Canada (TN), Chile (H-1B1), Mexico (TN), or Singapore (TN), you have a distinct advantage because you have a visa option that is available year-round.

The access to a visa at any time of the year helps take the pressure off both you and your prospective employer during the job search. In contrast, nationals of all other countries usually are trying to get an H-1B visa to work in the U.S., but due to the limited number of H-1B visas available each year and the high demand, the government runs a lottery every April to allocate the visas with about a 30% chance of being selected. A lot of companies, especially small to mid-size firms, are reluctant to take a chance on a visa lottery and many are not ready to make hiring decisions in the months running up to the H-1B visa lottery in April. The lottery can be a real obstacle for international students trying to find an employer to sponsor him or her for a visa.

The major drawback of the nationality-specific visas described above is that they do not allow for immigrant intent, which means your employer cannot sponsor you for permanent residence if you hold one of these visas. If permanent residence in the U.S. is an end goal, then you will need to eventually get an H-1B visa under which you can be sponsored for permanent residence. In the meantime, these visas offer a relatively straightforward path to living and working in the U.S.

 

The post Is your passport from one of these countries?: Nationality-specific visas for working and living in the U.S. appeared first on UC Berkeley Sutardja Center.



Source link